2008/12/10 Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 20:17 +0100, Iain Arnell wrote: >> >> As a recently sponsored contributor, I would suggest changing the >> documented procedures. I was more than happy to shove new packages >> into rawhide only, but when confronted with >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join and >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure >> felt obliged to request branches for F-9 and F-10 too (and pressure >> during review to support EPEL too only adds to the problem). >> >> Requests for new packages should only be permitted in rawhide by >> default (and consequently, EPEL+1 whenever and whatever that may be). >> Some form of additional review/sponsorship/bribery should be a >> prerequisite for branches in already-released version. >> > Interesting idea! Would you be willing to bring this topic to the next > FESCo meeting? FESCo is the body responsible for such decisions. > Unfortunately, I can't manage the next meeting, but I will make a point of bringing it up in the new year. -- Iain. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
