On Sun, 07 Dec 2008 22:34:49 +0100, Kevin wrote: > Well, there are cases where pkg-config is used at runtime, which is why the > MUST was changed to a SHOULD and the "The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files > depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes" > wording is now used. Talk to the FPC folks if you need to know more about > this issue. In the cases where it is indeed used at runtime, requiring > pkgconfig is actually the right thing to do That only works if the entire .pc dependency-chain is available in non-devel packages. In other words, it breaks if one of the .pc files Requires a .pc file located in a -devel pkg. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
