On Sun, 2008-12-07 at 22:34 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Well, there are cases where pkg-config is used at runtime, which is why the > MUST was changed to a SHOULD and the "The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files > depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes" > wording is now used. Talk to the FPC folks if you need to know more about > this issue. In the cases where it is indeed used at runtime, requiring > pkgconfig is actually the right thing to do (but requiring various -devel > packages isn't - if that's what's happpening, something needs to be done > about it). That's why I said "ensure proper placement of them based on the review guideline." and the guideline explains the proper placement. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
