On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 17:37 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > Explain how you think the broken deps checker would be broken! > The package _is_ in the ppc64 tree, isn't it? > > http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/updates/10/ppc64/appliance-tools-003.9-1.fc10.noarch.rpm > > Btw: > > $ rpm -qp --qf '[%{exclusivearch} ]' > appliance-tools-003.9-1.fc10.src.rpm > i386 i486 i586 i686 pentium3 pentium4 athlon geode x86_64 ppc alpha > sparc armv4l Looking at the spec itself, I see: ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64 ppc alpha sparc armv4l noarch I think that 'noarch' is throwing mash off when it's trying to determine if a noarch package is suitable for an arch. Please remove that and try again (trying it in rawhide should be suitable to test mash before pushing an update). -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
