Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 9 - 2008-11-14

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jesse Keating wrote:
Er, what exactly is the issue at hand?

I added "ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64 ppc alpha sparc armv4l noarch" to
the spec file however it is still reporting broken dep of qemu for ppc64.

So either the rpm *is* being pulled in to the tree eventhough ExclusiveArch is set, or whatever is checking for broken deops is reporting incorrectly.


-D

I know this is an old thread however I just got two more notifications for two new RPMs:

Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Your following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies:
>
> package: appliance-tools-003.9-1.fc10.noarch from fedora-updates-10-ppc64
>   unresolved deps:
>      qemu-img
>
> Your following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies:
>
> package: appliance-tools-002.8-1.fc9.noarch from fedora-updates-testing-9-ppc64
>   unresolved deps:
>      qemu-img



--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux