On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Richard Hughes <hughsient@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 17:43 +0100, Andrea Musuruane wrote: >> IMHO this proposal is not useful at all. As someone else already >> pointed, following Richard's advice, xine, totem, mplayer, vlc would >> all have the same description. Is this an improvement for the end >> user? I don't think so. Is this an improvement for the packager? Not >> at all. > > I don't think that's true at all, please re-read my email. > > Richard. How would that be bad though. Would it really be bad if the summaries of xine, totem, mplayer and VLC all read 'multi-codec media player'? -- Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin ( www.pembo13.com ) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
