2008/11/21 Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx>: > No guideline doesn't mean that things cannot be improved. Sure. > The fact that it is not mandatory doesn't make it less important. We have a set of guidelines that are common ground for reviews. What it is proposed here is not yet included. IMHO this proposal is not useful at all. As someone else already pointed, following Richard's advice, xine, totem, mplayer, vlc would all have the same description. Is this an improvement for the end user? I don't think so. Is this an improvement for the packager? Not at all. Therefore, Summary is something that the packager should choose on his own. It must be less than 80 characters and _maybe_ it should not contain the package name. Everything else is just marketing. If someone thinks that adding the fact that the application is based on Gnome, it is fine for me. If someone else thinks that mentioning that other application uses DBUS it is fine for me too. Regards, Andrea. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
