Re: RFC: fix summary text for lots of packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 05:43:50PM +0100, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> 
> Therefore, Summary is something that the packager should choose on his
> own. It must be less than 80 characters and _maybe_ it should not
> contain the package name. Everything else is just marketing. If

It should be legible, as short as possible while still being
informative. This is not only marketing. That being said I agree that
putting more in guideline is unuseful, trying to enhance summaries is
useful. Point is that a human should check that the sumary can indeed be
enhanced. And it should better be on review time.

--
Pat

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux