On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 05:13:33PM +0100, Andrea Musuruane wrote: > 2008/11/21 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet@xxxxxxxxx>: > > I think that point is irrelevant as RPM Fusion follows the same > > packaging guidelines as Fedora with a few legislation- and > > license-related exceptions. > > I perfectly know that RPM Fusion follows almost the same guidelines. I > was just pointing out that some of the package Richard was talking > about are not in Fedora. > > And, as a matter of fact, I don't see a guideline that forbids what > this thread is discussing. No guideline doesn't mean that things cannot be improved. The fact that it is not mandatory doesn't make it less important. -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list