Re: RFC: fix summary text for lots of packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 05:13:33PM +0100, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> 2008/11/21 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > I think that point is irrelevant as RPM Fusion follows the same
> > packaging guidelines as Fedora with a few legislation- and
> > license-related exceptions.
> 
> I perfectly know that RPM Fusion follows almost the same guidelines. I
> was just pointing out that some of the package Richard was talking
> about are not in Fedora.
> 
> And, as a matter of fact, I don't see a guideline that forbids what
> this thread is discussing.

No guideline doesn't mean that things cannot be improved. The fact that
it is not mandatory doesn't make it less important.

--
Pat

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux