Les Mikesell wrote: > Jesse Keating wrote: >> On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 13:02 -0600, Arthur Pemberton wrote: >>> Agreed. Which is one of the major driving factors for this >>> questionnaire thread. I figure Bugzilla must be doing some things >>> right. >> >> It's not that it's doing things right, it's just too cost prohibitive to >> create something else to do the same things in the same predictably >> wrong way (: > > That's actually pretty funny when compared to the reaction I get here to > comments regarding API and functional changes in fedora itself. > > But, lots of people like trac these days. > trac has some good features and some bad ones too: It's UI is poor because it hides things like "new ticket" unless you're logged in. It has no protection against mid-air collisions. If you hit the back button or a link by mistake, you can't go back to the previous page and have your painstakingly entered comment still be there. yadda yadda. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list