Le Jeu 20 novembre 2008 12:29, Matej Cepl a écrit : > > On 2008-11-19, 22:47 GMT, Arthur Pemberton wrote: >> There are several competing products, and I doubt we engineer >> type people use it "just because". I'm also assuming that we >> use it for reasons other than because of RedHat. > > Well, to make your list shorter (i.e., with one item): > > * To be able to support number of products, components, users, > hits per second as Bugzilla does. Problem I heard of all > competing products (trac, jira, etc.) is that they are lovely > when you are talking about one project with few components, but > when you get to clustering databases and similar magic, all of > them fail pretty badly. > * of course, open source -- just to be safe that there isn't some > Microsoft/Oracle/whatever closed source thing, which can manage > it. Add to this - feature completeness - familiar UI - integration with upstream issue trackers (which are often bugzilla too) For all its cranks bugzilla is familiar to a lot of bug reporters that use all the features added over time. Any replacement must be at least as feature-full as bugzilla (not simpler because it forgets to do some stuff) and offer a bugzilla-like mode for existing reporters that do not have the time to learn yet another reporting UI. -- Nicolas Mailhot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
