Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:48:42 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > >>> For instance, the following are over long, or repeat the program name: >>> >>> * System daemon that is a DBUS abstraction layer for package management >>> * XQilla is an XQuery and XPath 2.0 library, built on top of Xerces-C >>> * DeVeDe is a program to create video DVDs and CDs (VCD, sVCD or CVD) >>> >>> The following would be good replacements: >>> >>> * Package management framework >>> * XQuery and XPath 2.0 library >>> * Create video DVDs and CDs >>> >> * It would be good to have the program name mentioned here as well. > > Please don't. That has lead to many summaries, which look ugly > if displayed next to the package name: > > name - name is a... > Sorry. I meant, mention the name in the Guideline. Not mention the name in the Summary:. I agree with you 100% that package name in summary is extraneous. The examples in the Guideline should contain this information: Name: XQilla Verbose Summary: XQilla is an XQuery and XPath 2.0 library, built on top of Xerces-C Nice Summary: XQuery and XPath 2.0 library using Xerces-C Notes: * Putting package name in the summary was redundant * Since this is a library, specifying this requires Xerces-C is a point of differentiation. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
