On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 16:12 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 09:56 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Josh Boyer (jwboyer@xxxxxxxxx) said: > > > >It would also be a good idea to have a few "shining examples" for people > > > >to copy when creating new packages. When we've done that, I'll start > > > >filing bugs. > > > > > > Just file bugs for packages you think are overly verbose. Offer > > > alternate summaries in the bug, and a URL to your email for > > > rationale. > > > > I'm not sure this scales across 5000 packages. So it would be good > > to have at least *something* in the guidelines. > > Well, the FPG is intentionally lax on %summary's, because we had wanted > to avoid getting lot in endless discussions on something which is > technically widely meaningness. Right, but maybe we could have a soft guideline such as: * Summary should aim to be less than 8 words Richard. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
