On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:48:42 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > For instance, the following are over long, or repeat the program name: > > > > * System daemon that is a DBUS abstraction layer for package management > > * XQilla is an XQuery and XPath 2.0 library, built on top of Xerces-C > > * DeVeDe is a program to create video DVDs and CDs (VCD, sVCD or CVD) > > > > The following would be good replacements: > > > > * Package management framework > > * XQuery and XPath 2.0 library > > * Create video DVDs and CDs > > > * It would be good to have the program name mentioned here as well. Please don't. That has lead to many summaries, which look ugly if displayed next to the package name: name - name is a... Especially ugly if package name and program name are even written in the same case. Many many users don't care what name a program is given as long as it does what they want. Better make sure that hardly any packager does the following in a spec %description %summary to reuse the summary as the description. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
