Re: F11 Proposal: Stabilization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 10:23 +0100, Benny Amorsen wrote:
> I would be willing to run with updates-testing on by default on
> several machines if I was sure that faulty packages didn't just go
> away. The problem is that you're stuck with the upgraded package which
> turned out to be buggy, unless you do something manually to get rid of
> it. The alternative is to reissue the original package with a higher
> evra.

How often have you ran into bad updates that are just thrown away,
rather than fixed?  (and by fixed I mean either the bug caused in the
update has been fixed with even newer bits, or the old bits were
re-issued with higher e:n-v-r)

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux