RE: F11 Proposal: Stabilization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I am not sure if this exists with yum now or not.
My experience has been if something has been around for a while it usually
doesn't break things.  Or maybe the correct thing to say is that if it does
break things then there is a newer version fairly soon.
So is there a way to say that I only want updates that are 2 weeks old?

Jerry Williams

> -----Original Message-----
> From: fedora-devel-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:fedora-devel-list-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jesse Keating
> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 3:50 PM
> To: fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: F11 Proposal: Stabilization
> 
> On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 17:42 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
> >
> > Right - in some of these cases the last bit "pull in whatever else you
> > need" is the same as 'twist the firehose nozzle all the way as far as it
> > will go, hold tight!'
> 
> Hardly.  Much of the time updates are pretty self contained and
> independent of other updates.  Just because I want say pidgin updated
> doesn't mean I have to get OpenOffice.org updated too, or just because I
> want newer emacs doesn't mean I have to get newer eclipse+java, so on
> and so forth.  There really is a difference between targeted updates
> +deps and the firehose.
> 
> --
> Jesse Keating
> Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
> identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating



-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux