Re: F11 Proposal: Stabilization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, Jesse Keating wrote:

On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 17:42 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:

Right - in some of these cases the last bit "pull in whatever else you
need" is the same as 'twist the firehose nozzle all the way as far as it
will go, hold tight!'

Hardly.  Much of the time updates are pretty self contained and
independent of other updates.  Just because I want say pidgin updated
doesn't mean I have to get OpenOffice.org updated too, or just because I
want newer emacs doesn't mean I have to get newer eclipse+java, so on
and so forth.  There really is a difference between targeted updates
+deps and the firehose.


sure, that's why I said 'some'.

That's all.

-sv

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux