Re: Using updates-testing was [Re: Device change for Sil 3112 in latest kernel]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday 08 August 2004 23:40, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> It's just 3 weeks of work by an engineer experienced in this to go to a
> newer 2.4 for FC1 due to the extreme complexity of the NPTL patch. If
> FC1 is to get a newer  kernel it will be a 2.6 kernel. Which isn't going
> to happen realistically unless the Fedora Legacy project wants to be
> really brave.

We're not that brave, plus it flies in the face of our goals.

- -- 
Jesse Keating RHCE	(http://geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team	(http://www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key		(http://geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)

Was I helpful?  Let others know:
 http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBF5Kg4v2HLvE71NURApw6AJ4wwXl0Zbob2JM9sjBJl6uvBKiF2QCdHzfM
6skpXBWNQPxhf4k1yKTz0Ik=
=EA7y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux