> Hopefully, when we have a real process for external developers it'll > only be a matter of a developer saying "I think this should be > backported, okay if I go ahead?" and the developer at least doing a good > chunk of the work rather than stuff like this blocking on the amount of > time a given developer has available. except that for fedora the goal is(was) to ship newer versions instead of doing complex backports, right ? Which makes it even less work to be honest. (ok there are exceptions, the gray area probably is releasing a 2.6 kernel for FC1)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
