On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 05:23:48PM +0200, Florian La Roche wrote: > > which causes packagers to resort to either resort to build-require > > "bison m4" or "byacc" instead of "bison". > > Your buildsystem should always require m4 until our source base is cleaned > up to support this fine-grained level of requirements. Until now it is not. I've applied a few buildreq fixes from Steve Grubb, hopefully I'll get his next set soon and can carry on merging them. > So if the problems don't warrant an update, I think the only solution is > to add workarounds into the other packages. In the case of buildrequires > I think it would be bad to create additional rpms instead of adding m4 > to the list of essential rpm packages. Or reopen/file a new bug when it does become important.
