On Wed, 2022-05-04 at 19:04 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 09:20:35PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > We could look at what it would take to upstream the app tests we have > > already for Fedora. What I'm afraid of is that we'd wind up finding > > some subtle difference in theme or font rendering meant we'd have to > > duplicate all the needles, and re-do them all twice every time freetype > > or cantarell sneezes... > > So, um, maybe this is another place we could talk with GNOME upstream. Could > we have those upstream tests run on Rawhide? > > Also: where does GNOME _expect_ the human-based QA to happen? Especially for > the applications, it's going to be hard to automate thoroughly. Maybe we can > figure out something better there too. So the answer to both those questions is, AIUI, kinda the same: GNOME wants the testing run on GNOME OS. https://os.gnome.org/ which is (supposed to be, I don't know how closely it meets the goal ATM) a nightly live GNOME image with the latest versions of everything in it. Testing that is much more useful to upstream than testing Rawhide, because we certainly aren't updating all the bits of GNOME in Rawhide nightly. But if it's not built on Fedora (I don't think it is), it may well have differences in theme and font configuration that might make Fedora's openQA needles not match, which is the problem I'm concerned about with sharing the tests. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha https://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
