Re: Proposal: changes to "default application functionality" release criteria

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Wed, 2022-05-04 at 10:36 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Wed, May 4 2022 at 08:17:23 AM -0700, Adam Williamson 
> <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I get the perspective, but I'm not sure it's right. For a start,
> > there's no email app, so - if we ignore the continued existence of
> > Evolution, as GNOME seems determined to do, that means pretty much
> > everyone is going to either use a completely non-GNOMEified app
> > (Thunderbird), or a web service, to read their email. Both Thunderbird
> > and every common webmail service I can think of can also handle
> > contacts and calendar, so, why would someone take the trouble to use 
> > an
> > app for those instead?
> 
> Hi, we already have agreement to rename Geary to GNOME Mail and include 
> that in core after a few outstanding quality issues are fixed. Off the 
> top of my head: the unread mail counter is unreliable. It's pretty 
> close. Sadly, it's not actively maintained, so not getting any closer. 
> Needs a friendly maintainer before we can proceed.

That seems to be the problem in a nutshell for me: resources. There
seems to be a mismatch between GNOME's vision of what it wants to do,
and the resources it actually has to do it.

> Evolution is indeed not going to be included.
> 
> Regarding your other points: a Contacts manager seems like basic 
> functionality to me. Ditto for Calendar. I'm not so sure about Photos. 
> We've never had much agreement on Photos.

In theory, okay, maybe. If I was hired to whiteboard a desktop, yeah, I
guess I would maybe pencil in a mail client and a contact manager and a
calendar app. Apple has those, Android has them, I...think Windows
does? Not sure.

In practice, though, see above: it feels like the resources aren't
there. It doesn't seem like there are enough developers or enough
testers to actually build a *good* mail client and contact manager and
calendar app and ensure consistent quality.

It's also kinda telling to me that this hasn't caused the "scratch your
own itch" response. I'm not finding or fixing bugs in those apps
because I don't use them. I suspect the core, paid GNOME devs we have
aren't fixing those apps because they don't use them either. Do you use
Geary? Does Allan, or Matthias, or Ray, etc.? Do you use Contacts? Do
you use Calendar? In production, so that if they're broken you can't do
your job any more?

I guess what I'm suggesting is, if in the real world we don't have
enough people to build the thing we drew on the whiteboard, it's better
to pragmatically figure out which bits of it aren't *really* necessary
and cut those, than try to do everything without enough people and wind
up shipping stuff that isn't really usable or used.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA
IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha
https://www.happyassassin.net

_______________________________________________
desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux