Matthew Miller píše v Út 13. 12. 2016 v 11:19 -0500: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 04:12:49PM +0100, Jiri Eischmann wrote: > > That's for the initial experimenting for early adopters. I know > > that as > > a long term solution we need to have something more solid > > (transparent > > building, infra that is well maintained, enough bandwidth...). > > That's > > why we'd like to convince Mozilla to take over the building and > > hosting, but I heard Mozilla doesn't have abundance of hardware > > either > > and they want to see something tangible before they commit to it. > > Could we do the building but they do the hosting? I was told that Mozilla wouldn't host 3rd-party binaries, so it will have to be integrated in their build infrastructure and built there if we want them to host it. And I think it's a reasonable requirement. Fedora would require no less. But that's the step two. Now we focus on getting some experimental builds out to get early feedback and to have something tangible for Mozilla people to look at. We'd like to have two branches: stable where Firefox is not sandboxed and you'll get a very similar experience to the RPM one, and devel where we will sandbox it and test how Firefox can handle it to see where we need to change things because a fully sandboxed Firefox is the ultimate goal. Jiri
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
