Re: Fedora Branding - Re: I asked Hacker News what developers want from a desktop, and this is what they said

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]




----- Original Message -----
> On 8 November 2016 at 20:43, Christian Schaller <cschalle@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I would say though that focusing on having a logo is limiting our approach
> > in my opinion. You quickly recognize a Ubuntu screenshot due to their
> > orange
> > theme for instance, or a mac screenshot due to those 3 red, yellow, green
> > buttons
> > on their window decorations. So even without looking at the logos you
> > quickly identify those
> > systems when you see them.
> 
> Fedora 10 had its own window decorations and icon theme. That has
> changed and it is fine. Showcasing the original GNOME experience is
> good and I still believe the logo in the panel [1] an non-disruptive
> option to consider.

Fedora 10 didn't use GNOME 3.

I also already explained why the logo in the top left corner is problematic
(is it a control, is it a menu, is it separate from the activities control?).

Your screenshot is confusing, because you made other changes to your system.
You have a menu next to the logo. There's already a logo in our setup where
there is a menu there, in the Classic session.

> On 15 November 2016 at 17:28, Bastien Nocera <bnocera@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Most of GNOME's visual identity also has design foundations, they're not
> > gratuitous. Changing the visual identity (as opposed to making something
> > based on GNOME recognisable) means throwing away part of the user testing
> > and holistic approach to the desktop's design (from boot, all the way to
> > the
> > apps).
> 
> The user testing phase here is a bit overestimated. They only tested
> it once on 7 (seven) people, and the test covered tasks (like setting
> up the email client), visual identity was hardly elaborated.

Visual identity wasn't explicitly worked on, but changing the visual identity
would change controls.

> You can
> read about the whole process in the blog.

What blog?

> Boot screen is fairly
> independent, and the applications could be left alone.

I also explained the reasoning about the boot screen.
_______________________________________________
desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux