On Mon, 2016-11-07 at 10:14 -0500, Bastien Nocera wrote: > nobody tested the performance impact of the logo > watermark in gnome-shell. Is there a problem with it? On Mon, 2016-11-07 at 10:14 -0500, Bastien Nocera wrote: > We already have branding in GRUB, And it's dramatically worse than our upstream designs. I really hope we can find time to implement this: https://wiki.gnome.org/Design/OS/Boot https://wiki.gnome.org/Design/OS/BootOptions Someone recently mentioned an anecdote where a user just installed Fedora and thought the rescue kernel boot entry meant it had been installed multiple times by mistake. It's not OK to show kernel version in the bootloader.... > in plymouth, This is arguably the biggest wart on the distribution right now: our boot splash looks very poor compared to the plain spinner theme. Is poor branding worse than no branding? It's possible to make a great branded bootsplash -- just look at elementary OS -- but I think we'd be better off with the spinner than what we have right now. On the bright side, we have come a long way for these to be my primary concerns. :) Michael _______________________________________________ desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
