On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:31:53AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > > In any case, that's why the Council has asked for the PRDs to be > > reviewed annually. We need to be intentional and make sure that our > > plan is working, and adjust it where it isn't - and adapt to changing > > conditions in the world. But whatever we choose, it needs to be a real > > strategy with a focus we can deliver on - and then we need to do it. > I think every year is too often. I'd make it bienniel. It's a > significant process to produce the document and one year is hardly > long enough to evaluate any changes. I see the committment for a 2 > year PRD being greater to just "stick with the plan". The mere > potential for annual change in scope is tiresome. Yeah, I agree - and in practice it's been two years, so might as well make that official. I'll bring that up with the council. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
