On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > In any case, that's why the Council has asked for the PRDs to be > reviewed annually. We need to be intentional and make sure that our > plan is working, and adjust it where it isn't - and adapt to changing > conditions in the world. But whatever we choose, it needs to be a real > strategy with a focus we can deliver on - and then we need to do it. I think every year is too often. I'd make it bienniel. It's a significant process to produce the document and one year is hardly long enough to evaluate any changes. I see the committment for a 2 year PRD being greater to just "stick with the plan". The mere potential for annual change in scope is tiresome. -- Chris Murphy _______________________________________________ desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
