+1
This is simply defining the line in the sand with out-of-box installed
software, nothing more.
On 07/21/2016 11:07 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
----- Original Message -----
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 09:34:24AM -0400, Bastien Nocera wrote:
I think that those advanced settings are better handled through optional
after-installation downloads, in much the same way that we don't ship
gnome-tweak-tool in the default installation (because if those settings
were required, we would really want them to be in the default settings UI).
^^^^^^^^
I find this statement offensive to the intelligence of our users. It
basically disrepects some users' preferences by saying they aren't
"required" so it should be harder to set them.
No, it means that we don't show things that:
1) don't match use cases we're interested in
2) are work-arounds for particular use cases instead of properly designed fixes
3) are necessary for deployments, but not for individual users
If you think there are settings that are in gnome-tweak-tool should be available
in the main Settings panel, file a bug against gnome-control-center upstream,
and we'll consider it (if it hasn't already been).
We don't insult our users' intelligence, we just don't show settings that only
benefit a very small minority of our users, especially when that very small minority
is part of the existing Fedora and GNOME users that already know about the "TweakUI"
tools available.
--
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
