On Wed, 13.04.16 08:44, Bastien Nocera (bnocera@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 10:49 PM, Michael Catanzaro > > <mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Second, my understanding is > > > that the ABRT developers prefer to improve abrt-cli and tell people to > > > use that rather than coredumpctl. > > > > Any particular reason for that preference? As coredumpctl gets more > > and more widespread, having the same tool as other distros should make > > Fedora more approachable which I think is a good thing? > > The upstream systemd developers I talked to weren't interested in adapting > coredumpctl to be usable for use cases other than for developers. What precisely do you need? > It doesn't claim to be usable for end-users reporting bugs, and the original > developers have no interest in making changes that would allow that. I indeed think coredumpctl should probably be something for more professional users. But I'd be curious what you are missing in coredumpctl. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
