Re: atomic workstation status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]





On Mon, Apr 4, 2016, 9:13 AM Matthias Clasen <mclasen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 10:45 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:

>
> In a grand view of the future, we have talked about "PET" containers
> and a PET container could be a SPC container that you could dnf
> install 
> into,
> Should this be part of the Atomic Workstation, and could this be a 
> Desktop Pet?

We want the desktop itself to be immutable, so it should not be a pet
container. Otherwise many advantages of going image-based are lost.


Are there users who use more than one DE and switch between them? Are they a considerable minority?


Chris Murphy
--
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux