Re: atomic workstation status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]





On 04/04/2016 11:12 AM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 10:45 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
In a grand view of the future, we have talked about "PET" containers
and a PET container could be a SPC container that you could dnf
install
into,
Should this be part of the Atomic Workstation, and could this be a
Desktop Pet?
We want the desktop itself to be immutable, so it should not be a pet
container. Otherwise many advantages of going image-based are lost.
--
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Well it could be an immutable container also. Just using this as an example.

The question would be can the desktop environment add additional xdg-app
containers.
--
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux