On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I agree with Paul, I don't think all of this needs to be finished for > the alpha release, but I do think there needs to be some substantial > and testable implementation for the features we decide are blockers, > even if the results of those tests are "it's not working very well." > > I propose that we revisit any issues that we agree are blockers, and > make our go/no-go decision at the last WG meeting before the alpha > freeze -- that is, two weeks from today -- based on the progress of any > hero development that occurs before then. > > If we decide to go, then I propose we use the standard blocker bug > process to track unfinished blocker issues as automatic *beta* release > blockers using the standard blocker process, and simply delay F24 beta > until they are done. It's time to eliminate uncertainty and set clear > expectations early on for what we will be releasing. This will > incentivize developers to treat Wayland issues (such as the shrinking > gnome-terminal) more seriously. > > El mié, 17-02-2016 a las 11:45 -0500, Paul W. Frields escribió: >> * Tablet support and protocols >> (I take it this is "~equivalent set to what we handle now in >> GNOME") > > -1 blocker, only a small minority of users need Wacom tablets, and they > can skip one release. Why would they have to do that? The X session isn't going anywhere you can just login into X. -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
