On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 7:20 AM, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 03:07:25PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: >> (I'd bug Smooge for different slicing and updated numbers, but he's >> busy doing datacenter stuff this week and I've already overbugged him.) > > I now have these updated numbers. For Workstation over the course of > 2015, it's 20%. This is a lot higher than I expected given that 64-bit > is given prominence on <https://getfedora.org/en/workstation/download/>. VMWare/VirtualBox are other candidates. For some reason people use the 32-bit versions of those and choose 32-bit images. > (Although I wonder if it has something to with people skipping past the > header and green button when looking for something to click, and going > right to the "Other Downloads" column. It'd be interesting to do some > web design A/B testing....) Were your numbers only for downloads, or were they for updates? Existing installs are a pain to convert so if the numbers included installs then you're dragging in a lot of pre-existing users. josh -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
