On Fri, 2015-05-15 at 16:41 +0200, Richard Marko wrote: > On 05/15/2015 03:35 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > On Fri, 2015-05-15 at 08:47 -0400, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > As far as GNOME is concerned, the ABRT setting is deprecated. > > Well it's obviously unacceptable to have two different settings for > > the > > same thing, one of which supercedes the other. > > > > Tangentially related: to be blunt, I have no confidence that the > > ABRT > > developers can get the GUI into shape in any reasonable timespan > > (next > > 2-3 years) and I'd prefer for us to not ship the GUI at all. > > Sure. It's rocket science to make a GUI according to Gnome HIG, cause > it > shouldn't have any buttons or features. 2-3 years? I can and I will > write an Qt app for ABRT in 2-3 days when our DBus API stabilizes. > > I'm wondering what according to you is "in shape" as in my experience > most Gnome apps went downhill in terms of usability, features and > overall look. I think we've gotten off on a bit of a compative tangent here. Lets try to stay constructive. The ABRT ui has improved _a lot_ in F22, and I'd like to thank you for working on that with Bastien. I don't think there's any need to kick out the current UI (from our side) or throw it all away and start over in Qt (from your side). We just have to smooth out the last remaining rough edges in the user experience. -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
