Re: Significant drop in ABRT reports in F22

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 2015-05-15 16:41, Richard Marko wrote:
Sure. It's rocket science to make a GUI according to Gnome HIG, cause it
shouldn't have any buttons or features. 2-3 years? I can and I will
write an Qt app for ABRT in 2-3 days when our DBus API stabilizes.

I'm wondering what according to you is "in shape" as in my experience
most Gnome apps went downhill in terms of usability, features and
overall look.

Sorry for a bit of a naive question, since I don't know the full span of problems that ABRT needs to solve, but how much UI is needed for a problem reporting app? For a lot of other platforms and apps it's usually a dialog or a checkbox, but perhaps their requirements are very different from ABRT.

For someone who's not a problem-reporting-geek, but happy to help improving Fedora, I found the latest version in F22 such an improvement to the extent that I no longer turn it off on a fresh installation. Previously I had a really hard time reporting crashes and the UI confused me a lot. Big thanks to all the developers who worked on the latest version!

(I turned on automatic reporting on both my systems from today btw, hope the data is useful!)
- Andreas
--
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux