On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 06:02 -0400, Bastien Nocera wrote: >> > * Shell extensions: As long as we're going to offer them, we >> > shouldn't >> > relegate them to Tweak Tool. Perhaps gnome-software would be a >> > better >> > location than gnome-control-center, but either would be better than >> > Tweak Tool. (But the gnome-shell browser plugin is very crashy at >> > worst and unreliable at best, so we should fix that first.) >> >> Extensions is what happens when designers and developers don't agree. >> If you know you want extensions, installing gnome-tweak-tool is only >> a >> step away. If people want to integrate that better, they can add >> support >> to the gnome-shell web browser plugin to show whether or not gnome >> -tweak-tool >> is installed, and launch Software to install it through the browser >> if not. >> > > At the same time, I think it would be very useful to poll GNOME users > for what extensions they are using (if any). I think you'll find that > it's very likely that more users have installed (for example) the > Alternate Tab extension than are using the default behavior (and it > would also be interesting to know whether those using the default > behavior know about the extension). > > Some other extensions that I personally know a great many people cannot > live without: > [...] > or hiding them entirely (Wayland) [...] This is plain wrong. They work as bad/well on wayland as on X. The only thing is there is no systray icon api for wayland applications. Only X11 apps (through xwayland) can use them. -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop