On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 03:48:47PM +0100, Kalev Lember wrote: > On 11/18/2014 03:16 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > OK, a lot of quick action on this, on the part of several people > > yesterday and this morning. Here's what we discovered: > > > > Package bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161637 > > Upstream git: https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/background-logo-extension.git/ > > > > (1) The SRPM in the bug appears to be *newer* than git (includes > > e.g. prefs.js, control utility). Maybe something wasn't pushed? > > However, the SRPM seems like it should work. > > Excellent, thanks for looking into this! Florian was waiting on approved > design before doing a final upstream release and now that we have it, he > should be able to do the release. > > > (2) We need to package a wordmark, since that works visually better > > than the Fedora infinity-bubble logomark. Also, from the mockups, an > > < 100% opacity was desirable. Ryan has sent that on to Spot to add to > > fedora-logos. > > Great -- we'll need a new fedora-logos build for the installer branding > anyway. Correct, I *think* we're waiting on that from Spot. > > (3) The package needs a .gschema.override file to point to the new > > logo. That seems like the right thing to do for a distro-specific > > change like this. I wasn't able to find fmuellner on line yesterday > > or this morning, so given the freeze, Stephen Gallagher was planning > > to help us with packaging since he's a provenpackager. I pasted this: > > http://fpaste.org/151778/16319651/ > > It's a fedora-specific package anyway, I think we should be able to > avoid the overrides and just default to the correct logo. Florian, what > do you say? > > Another thing we'll need is to include an override somewhere to enable > the extension by default. fedora-release-workstation seems like an > appropriate place -- I'll send a patch to dgilmore a bit later today > that adds the override if nobody comes up with a better way of doing it. I don't know another way. > > If anyone has concerns or suggestions, please add them ASAP... the > > freeze is on today, so we may end up needing a QA exception to get > > this stuff done. > > Yes, we're already frozen now, definitely need a QA exception. I put the Fedora package review bug on the tracker for proposed exceptions. It sounds like we need another bug for the fedora-release-workstation changes -- that will make it easiest to track I think. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
