Re: Workstation feedback on generic-release-workstation request?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 09:54:59AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> 1) You now have to release an update for fedora-release-workstation
> every time a new package gets a per-product configuration (to add the
> new Requires)

I think that's okay. That kind of change should generally happen as
part of the release development cycle, not arbitrarily.

> 2) Every deployment of Workstation now carries configuration for
> packages that may never be installed (and configuration isn't
> necessarily small, though most of the time it will be).

Do you have an example that _isn't_ small?


> 3) From a user's perspective, if they see configuration for a service or
> application in their package list, they may assume that package is
> installed and running, leading to confusion.

That is more worrying, yes.


-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
-- 
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux