Re: Workstation feedback on generic-release-workstation request?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Fri, 2014-10-17 at 16:18 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> 
> 
> On Fri, 2014-10-17 at 14:46 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1154154 is a request to provide 
> > a generic-release-workstation (sub)package in order to allow for 
> > convenient remixing of a debranded Fedora Workstation.
> > 
> > It seemed odd that firewalld-config-workstation would require 
> > system-release-workstation and if this were to be done we'd need to be 
> > sure not to break Fedora composes. I was hoping to hear some comments 
> > from the workstation group in the ticket.
> 
> firewalld-config-workstation requires system-release-workstation
> specifically to enable the creation of generic-release-workstation
> packages. (Both generic-release-workstation and
> fedora-release-workstation would Provides: system-release-workstation)

Not sure I understand this. Why does firewalld-config-workstation need
to require any release package ? That seems backwards to me.

-- 
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux