On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 3:25 AM, Bastien Nocera <bnocera@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:36:38PM +0000, Debarshi Ray wrote: >> > > It is important >> > > to have visible Fedora branding somewhere. >> > That sounds as if there is no Fedora branding at all at the moment, or >> > that people are trying to aggressively remove all of them. That is not >> > true. >> >> There is no Fedora branding in the shell chrome, which is what I was >> responding to with that quote. I didn't mean to suggest that people are >> trying to remove that. I am, however, definitely saying that I don't think >> it's sufficient for what we need. >> >> I don't want to be confrontational either. I just want everyone to be >> working together to make and show off an awesome *Fedora*. > > And we're saying that the Fedora brand is prominent enough as it is. The onus > is on you to show that stronger branding is necessary. I really don't think that > it is. And if the upstream didn't think it was a good idea to show logos in the > default chrome, I don't see any gains being made adding one. Who is we? I don't mean that question to be confrontational. I'm asking because you seem to be representing a group of people and I'm curious who that group is. Also, there's no onus on either party here. Fedora Workstation is Fedora. GNOME upstream is GNOME upstream. Each can chose to display logos or not according to what they believe best suits them. josh -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
