On Tue, 2014-08-26 at 08:55 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > Are you suggesting Shotwell over gthumb? If so, why? gthumb does a much > better job of conforming to our HIG than eog and Shotwell, and it seems > to have a comparable feature set to Shotwell. I've used Shotwell quite extensively and don't understand why you are advocating so strongly against it being the default photo *management* application? I understand the point that Shotwell Previewer isn't really suited for being the default image viewer. But as a photo management application, Shotwell has some nice features: - non-destructive photo editing (it doesn't touch your original photos, edits are stored in a database and applied on the fly) - simple adjusting of the time and date of multiple photos at once - automatic grouping of photos into events based on the time taken - organizing photos by events, tags or via the file system hierarchy I didn't have the time to test the new gThumb and I only saw the screenshots, so please tell me, how does gThumb compare in the above areas? Regards, Tadej -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
