On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 6:45 PM, Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2014-08-26 at 18:18 +0300, Elad Alfassa wrote: >> I think we got enough reasons here to have eog as the default viewer. >> We can still install shotwell (or gthumb or whatever) by default as a >> "manager" if people want it. > > Yeah, let's cross out all of the Shotwell options, I think there's > sufficient consensus to move past that now. > > Remaining options: > > * eog as default and only image viewer > * gthumb as default and only image viewer > * eog as default image viewer, with gthumb installed as shotwell > replacement > > Nobody besides me is advocating for gthumb here. That either suggests we > should not install it, or more likely that nobody else has tried the new > gthumb. Or both. :) It has much better integration with GNOME than eog. > There are some screenshots at [1] but they are showing off the advanced > features rather than the simple image previewer mode that users will see > when opening an image (which is the second to last screenshot, but > without the big sidebar). I have just tested it. And you indeed have a point. In contrast to eog it feels like a gnome 3 app and isn't "bloated" manager app. Given that it integrates better into the desktop (consistent look and feel) I'd opt for it. -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
