Hi, > We have a deadline for the PRD coming up in about a week. I'd like to > actually have something to present to FESCo. Can we please either > agree to trust each other or barring that call for a vote on one of > the current draft PRDs? Members of the Workstation WG really need to > speak up here. Is possible to have some compromise/midway between the two drafts? As I see it they mostly just differ in the contexts they set: Christian's having more emphasis on different types of developers and Matthew's being closer perhaps to the traditional Fedora user audience. I feel like a lot of the arguments have been "Desktop vs Workstation", and I agree that the core subset of Workstation (ie essentially minus all the developers tools and libraries/devel stacks) should also be good too for general non-developer users. There is a lot of text about making Fedora Workstation an enticing platform for developers which I am all for but I do feel that the PRD should also cover some basic criteria for a successful core desktop to support that: things like being lightweight and generally getting out of the users way, and supporting an informative configurable panel out of the box, etc. It doesn't have to be a detailed explicit feature list but some kind of vision on the type/flavor of core desktop we are aspiring to for Workstations would be appealing to include IMHO. Since time is running out, should we have a WG meeting this week to seek agreement and flesh out any final changes? I don't feel we are so far from an acceptable final document. Jens -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
