On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 13:59 +0100, Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller wrote: > Hi everyone, > First of all apologize for this taking so long, I ended up traveling > non-stop for some time visiting some of Red Hats desktop customers. > While not directly tied to the work of this working group I do hope to > take some of the lessons learned from those meetings with me into the > future work of the working group. > > Anyway I tried editing the PRD a bit based on the feedback we got on the > first draft. I tried to make a few items a bit clearer and also to > include spelling fixes contributed and so on. > > We probably want to do another WG meeting soon to discuss next steps. > > Feel free to let me know if I forgot to include some important feedback > or if further clarifications are needed. "Upgrading the system multiple times through the upgrade process should give a result that is the same as an original install of Fedora Workstation." Based on my experience (>10 years of it, with multiple distributions and OSes), this is an incredibly ambitious goal. It may in fact be entirely unachievable as written. I'm not aware of a single operating system in existence which actually achieves this. Even cellphone manufacturers - who have a very clearly-defined single piece of hardware to deal with, and a much smaller set of software and use cases to worry about than we have - don't achieve this. I'm really not sure it should be front and centre in a foundational document without some really convincing evidence that it's even vaguely achievable. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop