On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Elad Alfassa <elad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: >> >> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Elad Alfassa <elad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> > Hi. >> > Does the "Fedora Workstation" vision means we can disable (or even >> > remove) >> > all enterprise stuff (nfs, iscsi, and lots of other pointless services >> > for >> > desktops) by default in our product? >> >> It could. I don't think we're quite to that level of detail yet though. >> >> > Can we, for example, ask the Anacoda team to make dependencies on >> > enterprise-class storage optional, thus enabling us to not ship it by >> > default on the workstation product? >> >> I doubt this is really specific to anaconda. I don't think they want >> to create a separate installer for all the products and they are going >> to need those dependencies on the install media to accomplish installs >> for other products. > > My idea was to conditionally load those libraries. If they are not present, > disable enterprise storage support in the UI. Sounds not too complicated. >> >> That doesn't mean the enterprise-class packages >> need to be _installed_ on a Workstation install though. > > It does, at least if we continue do live installs the way we do them now > (rsync) Yeah that way we even end up with anaconda on the installed system which makes no sense at all. Maybe we need some postinstall phase to remove such stuff. -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
