Cosimo Cecchi (ccecchi@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 14:38 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > > - the logo would likely not be the stock distributor's one, but one > > > identifying the organization providing that leased/temporary service to > > > the user. I can think of a number of reasons related to > > > billing/support/accountability as of why this makes a lot more sense > > > than in the "personal use" case. > > > > ... which, since many distributors of GNOME need to account for this case, > > seems reasonable enough reason to have that space reserved in both the > > login screen and any boot-time display (e.g. plymouth) already for a logo, > > and for Fedora to put its logo there. > > It sounds like we're going to have a logo in Fedora in any case, but > just for the sake of making my point clear, I really don't see why the > former (having that possibility available for specific use cases of some > users) would necessarily imply the latter (put a Fedora logo there for > all users). If nothing else, having it be the default makes it a good test case to ensure that it works, and also to give those that want to customize it later an entry point. With respect to having a logo, the suggestion posted by Ryan of having it center-bottom would seem to be the cleanest one - there it would seem less likely to me to distract from the center-focus of the login screen itself, but would be notable/sized enough that a reasonable logo could be used instead of the top-left titlebar approach. Bill -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
