On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 10:11:40 -0500, Michael Cronenworth <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > Disabling services that support hardware by default is not the appropriate > > way forward. > > I think you misread his email, Bruno. > > For example: Most people don't need LLDP turned on, and I can say that > with certainty unless there is a huge data center following and we cater > exclusively to them. It's things like this that end up polluting Fedora > boot over time and /that/ is not the appropriate way forward. Supporting rarely used hardware is hardly catering to exclusive groups. It is actually being more inclusive. Running the services isn't directly a problem. There was a concern, because at least one of these services was using a significant amount of CPU time even when there was no matching hardware attached. These are the kind of issues that need to be addressed. -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
