Re: GNOME 3 Test Day #1: announcement up

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 02/02/2011 05:00 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 09:15 +0000, "JÃhann B. GuÃmundsson" wrote:
>> On 02/02/2011 07:01 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> Ah - if I'd've known a couple of days ago we could have changed the
>>> date, but I've sent announcements out to quite a few places now so I
>>> think we're locked in. The good news is we can do custom live spins for
>>> the test day, so even if you can't get it done in time for the nightly
>>> builds, we can fire off some custom builds. I am ridiculously tired
>>> right now but I'll be in IRC tomorrow, I'll join GIMPnet so I can come
>>> in the desktop channel in case you need to sync up with me. I can help
>>> do some builds if that would be any use. Just let me know! Thanks.
>> Have the installation issues been cleaned out?
> I don't know. as Bruno said, the intention is for the testing to be
> possible (almost) entirely without installation, and that should be the
> case.

Of course those that are using USB Flash drive can create one with 
persistent storage to get a closer to actual install behaviour but we 
loose any early Gnome Shell adopters which might shed light on some 
usage bugs that the test case don't cover which you only find by an 
actual usage.

I'm pretty sure alot of bugs filed against Gnome components will be 
related to UI Designs decisions rather than actual code breakage by 
reporters for instance somehow the UI Designers forgot all about those 
that close the lid and leave the computer on for download or are forced 
to close the lid in class when the teacher or professors ask them too 
and then need to get immediately back on to type something down thus 
cant wait for suspend/resume time/breakage which is a *Design feature*  
as Richard mention on his blog "In GNOME 3.0, weâre defaulting to 
suspending the computer when the user shuts the lid, and not providing 
any preferences combobox to change this. This is what the UI designers 
for GNOME 3.0 want " I for example would file a bug against this.

Another example of a potential bug or a *Design feature* is when you go 
to system settings --> User Account and you create a new user and are 
forced to choose the login name for the user from a list of user names 
based on the full name you enter for the user or is this an actual bug 
that you cannot type whatever username you like for the user? Bug vs 
Design battle. .. .

Anyway back on track we might want to downgrade smolt since it's not 
working due to bug  672971 that is if smolt profile is needed ( which I 
expect to ) another thing was mentioned on our QA IRC  from a reporter 
was a lack of IRC client in current Gnome Live but I think the reporter 
did not realize that you can do irc with empathy.

Reporters have already begun jump starting the test day 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-02-03_GNOME3_Alpha#cite_note-11 
and reported some early birds bugs.

We also need to have any updates to current packages present as updates 
tomorrow and not just be on specifically composed test day LiveCD to 
prevent/reduce any duplication and reports of bugs that may already be 
fixed it's always better that reporters are testing as close to the same 
bits..

JBG
-- 
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux