On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > one of the common themes of the F14 review cycle was ridiculing the lack > of an office suite on the desktop image, particularly given the presence > of 'useless' things like planner (I'm paraphrasing from the reviews, not > giving my own personal opinion). I know we have good arguments against > including an office suite, and I suspect planner is just in there as a > hangover from when we tried to include GNOME Office, but there does seem > to be a consistent impression in reviews that the current package choice > seems bizarre. Weren't those reasons related to lack of space in the LiveCD? Ubuntu always had openoffice on their live, but I was told they could do it because they did not use our very same upstream (go-oo inteast ooo, again IIRC) and their upstream made it easier to split the suite into finer packaging. Maybe the whole story is bogus, but having Writer and/or Impress and/or Calc is a must to stand well in reviews, IMHO -- Gianluca Sforna http://morefedora.blogspot.com http://identi.ca/giallu - http://twitter.com/giallu -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
