On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 11:52 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 18:32:36 +0200, > Martin Sourada <martin.sourada@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > For the immediate problem -- I'm not sure what is better packaging-wise, > > but I could do one of the following > > * move -gnome into -gnome-tod (with the virtual provides and > > perhaps obsolete -gnome < 14.1.0), create the needed xmls and > > put them into -gnome > > * create the needed xmls and put them into -gnome-simple (less > > work) > > I don't think you need to make a laughlin-backgrounds-gnome-tod. > We should be able to properly spil stuff between laughlin-backgrounds-gnome > and laughlin-backgrounds-single as long as we can get a single xml file > to work for both cases. > > > In order to help you solve your problem the best would be to create > > these two sub-packages in a way that the xmls would be the same and thus > > in direct conflict. I'm not sure how to properly handle the defaults > > yet. Perhaps adding the virtual provide to the -simple one as well, but > > the we'd have to make sure to correct package is pulled in... > > I'd rather not see a conflicts. That is going to cause problems. > > > Any better ideas? > > Is there someplace that describes the details of that xml file? > I am trying to search through the gnome documentation but haven't found > the reference for that file yet. I have no idea :( These things are really badly documented... Most you can get is inspecting the code directly... Martin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
